
The U.S. government may begin deportations to Libya this week despite previously condemning the country for its severe human rights abuses and ongoing civil conflict.
At a Glance
- Trump administration officials are planning to deport migrants to Libya, possibly beginning as early as this week
- Libya has been politically unstable since 2011, with the U.S. State Department warning of “crime, terrorism, unexploded landmines, civil unrest, kidnapping, and armed conflict”
- The deportation plan aims to deter illegal border crossings by sending migrants to locations far from the U.S.
- Human rights groups have condemned the plan, citing Libya’s notorious detention centers where torture and slavery have been documented
- The administration has already deported 152,000 people as of Monday, according to sources
Plans for Libyan Deportations Emerge
Details surfaced Wednesday about the Trump administration’s plans to potentially begin deporting migrants to Libya as part of its broader immigration enforcement strategy. Sources indicate these deportations could begin as early as this week and might be carried out using U.S. military flights. The Pentagon has referred questions on the matter to the White House, while the White House, State Department, and Department of Homeland Security have declined to comment on the reported plans.
The administration has already been active in deportation efforts, with 152,000 people reportedly deported as of Monday. This potential expansion to include Libya marks a significant escalation in the administration’s approach to immigration enforcement and represents a departure from previous practices. Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently indicated the administration’s desire to send migrants to countries increasingly distant from U.S. borders.
US officials said that there is pressure from senior leadership to deport more migrants. Many of the nations under consideration are countries where the U.S. government has raised serious concerns about human rights abuses, including the mistreatment of detainees and migrants pic.twitter.com/zki2c1IDsw
— Vera Bergengruen (@VeraMBergen) April 2, 2025
Libya’s Human Rights Situation Raises Concerns
Libya has experienced serious instability since the overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi in 2011, with governance divided between competing factions in the eastern and western parts of the country. The U.S. State Department itself advises against travel to Libya due to what it describes as “crime, terrorism, unexploded landmines, civil unrest, kidnapping, and armed conflict.” These same conditions have prompted serious questions about the ethics and legality of deporting migrants to such an environment.
Human rights organizations have expressed particular concern about Libya’s detention facilities, which have been documented as sites of severe abuse. The U.S. State Department’s own reporting has characterized these facilities as having “harsh and life-threatening” conditions and noted practices of “arbitrary arrest or detention.” Despite these assessments, the administration appears prepared to deport migrants to these conditions as part of its enforcement strategy.
— Bennetta Elliott (@belliott123) April 20, 2025
Strategic and Diplomatic Considerations
Administration officials have framed these deportation efforts as part of a broader strategy to deter illegal immigration by creating significant consequences for those who enter the country unlawfully. Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently articulated this approach, stating, “We are actively searching for other countries to take people from third countries… not just El Salvador. We are working with other countries to say: ‘we want to send you some of the most despicable human beings to your countries, will you do that as a favor to us?’ And the further away from America, the better so they can’t come back across the border.”
“We are working with other countries to say: We want to send you some of the most despicable human beings, will you do this as a favor to us”, said Marco Rubio.
Questions remain about whether an agreement with Libyan authorities has been secured to accept these deportees. The administration has previously deported third-country nationals to various Central American nations and Venezuelan men to El Salvador, suggesting a pattern of establishing such arrangements. However, given Libya’s fractured governance structure and ongoing internal conflicts, it remains unclear which Libyan authorities would be party to any such agreement and how deportees would be processed upon arrival.
Implementation Challenges
Several factors could potentially prevent or delay the reported deportations to Libya. These include legal challenges similar to the recent Supreme Court temporary bar on deporting Venezuelan migrants accused of gang membership. Logistical difficulties of coordinating deportation flights to a conflict zone and diplomatic complications could also intervene. The United Nations special representative for Libya has highlighted the country’s ongoing crises and called for international support to establish democratic governance, underscoring the complex environment into which deportees would be sent.