New Lawsuit Rocks Higher Ed DEI

California’s latest legal battle could dismantle race-based scholarships and send shockwaves through higher education’s DEI initiatives.

At a Glance

  • A lawsuit challenges UC San Diego’s race-based scholarships under the Ku Klux Klan Act.
  • Pacific Legal Foundation claims these scholarships violate federal and state anti-discrimination laws.
  • The lawsuit could set a precedent affecting similar programs nationwide.
  • Broader national scrutiny on DEI initiatives is intensified by this case.

Legal Challenge to Race-Based Scholarships

The Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) has filed a lawsuit against the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) and the San Diego Foundation, alleging that the Black Alumni Scholarship Fund (BASF) violates anti-discrimination laws. The lawsuit, filed on July 16, 2025, in the Southern District of California, challenges the scholarships under the Enforcement Act of 1871, also known as the Ku Klux Klan Act. Plaintiffs, including students of various ethnic backgrounds, argue that these scholarships deprive them of equal opportunity simply because of their race.

This case stems from a workaround that UCSD implemented after California’s Proposition 209, which banned race-based affirmative action in public universities. To circumvent this, UCSD transferred the administration of BASF to the San Diego Foundation. However, plaintiffs claim that the university’s continued involvement and reliance on racial data violate both federal and state laws. The lawsuit seeks to halt UCSD from releasing demographic data to the BASF and demands a court order to stop race-based scholarship awards.

Potential Impact and Implications

If successful, this lawsuit could set a significant precedent, restricting public universities from using private entities to sidestep anti-discrimination laws. This could affect similar programs across the nation, forcing educational institutions to reassess their DEI strategies. For students, a victory for the plaintiffs could mean broader access to financial aid opportunities previously restricted to specific racial groups. On the other hand, black students might lose targeted financial support, sparking further debates over fairness and equity.

Broader National Context

This legal battle arrives amidst heightened scrutiny of DEI initiatives in higher education. Recent Supreme Court decisions, such as the 2023 ruling in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, further restricted race-based admissions, placing additional pressure on institutions to comply with anti-discrimination laws. The lawsuit against UCSD is part of a broader movement challenging the constitutionality and fairness of race-based programs.

Conservative groups like the Pacific Legal Foundation and Californians for Equal Rights Foundation are at the forefront of these legal battles, advocating for policies they believe uphold the principles of equal protection under the law. As the lawsuit progresses, it will serve as a critical test for the future of DEI in higher education, potentially accelerating the rollback of race-conscious initiatives.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR