Donald Trump urged Israeli prosecutors to drop Benjamin Netanyahu’s corruption case, labeling it a political “witch hunt,” raising questions about international legal interventions.
At a Glance
- Trump calls Netanyahu’s corruption case a “witch hunt.”
- Trump suggests trial disrupts Middle East peace efforts.
- Netanyahu faces serious charges but denies wrongdoing.
- Trial delay coincides with Trump’s intervention.
Trump’s Bold Intervention
Donald Trump has stirred international waters by calling for Israeli prosecutors to halt the corruption trial against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. In characteristic fashion, Trump labeled the trial a “witch hunt,” echoing his own experiences in the legal arena. His post on Truth Social suggested that the trial’s proceedings could impede crucial negotiations with Iran and Hamas, introducing a dimension of international diplomacy to an already complex case.
US President Donald #Trump on Saturday renewed his call for a ceasefire deal in Gaza and the return of Israeli captives, while sharply criticizing the Israeli judiciary over Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ongoing corruption trial.
In a post on Truth Social, Trump declared:… pic.twitter.com/YrXoZC2Nwb
— Al Mayadeen English (@MayadeenEnglish) June 29, 2025
Watch a report: President Trump criticizes corruption trial against Benjamin Netanyahu
Trump urged to “Let Bibi go,” referencing Netanyahu’s prime ministerial duties, an indication of his stance against what he views as politically driven legal actions. As Netanyahu struggles with charges of fraud, breach of trust, and bribery, Trump’s backing adds a layer of diplomatic tension between Israel and the United States. The ripple effects of this intervention are being keenly felt across both nations as they navigate unfolding political landscapes.
Reactions and Ramifications
In the core of the Israeli legal drama, Trump described the trial as “INSANITY,” seeing parallels with his own legal challenges. Netanyahu, battling accusations related to illicit benefits and favorable media coverage, remains defiant against allegations, terming them as a political coup attempt. This connection with Trump highlights the broadening divide over judicial proceedings and accountability.
Trump’s vocal support aligns with his apparent reluctance to see allies face accountability when he perceives them as aligned with his political philosophy. This stance is further compounded by Yair Lapid and other Israeli politicians, who have expressed discomfort over what they see as an inappropriate intervention by a former U.S. President.
Legal and Diplomatic Implications
Netanyahu’s legal battle, already prolonged due to COVID-19 and international conflicts, saw a new twist with the recent delay, aligning with Trump’s vocal protest. Critics question Netanyahu’s strategic use of international crises to overshadow legal proceedings. The trial’s postponement raises concerns about judicial independence and the extent of U.S. influence on one of its closest allies.
“LET BIBI GO, HE’S GOT A BIG JOB TO DO!” – Trump
Trump’s assertion that U.S. financial support should sway Israeli legal decisions underscores his unique approach to foreign policy and judicial matters. The intersection of aid, political favoritism, and international diplomacy has placed Netanyahu’s trial under a global spotlight, magnifying the scrutiny from an already turbulent legal realm.
