Hochul And James Promise To Stand Against Trump, Critics Say Records Show A Pattern Of Rights Restrictions

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul and Attorney General Letitia James are framing themselves as defenders of New Yorkers’ freedoms in anticipation of the incoming Trump administration. At a recent press conference, they pledged to stand up against potential federal policies they believe could undermine the rights of state residents. However, critics argue that their own actions in office have frequently restricted individual rights.

Hochul announced the “Empire State Freedom Initiative,” describing it as a way to shield New Yorkers from potential federal actions regarding immigration, labor laws, and environmental policies. Many New Yorkers, however, remember her aggressive support for COVID-era lockdowns, mask mandates, and even state surveillance discussions to enforce compliance. Critics argue that such measures, rather than protecting rights, infringed on personal freedoms and limited choices for businesses and individuals across the state.

Attorney General James, who has led high-profile legal cases against Trump, stated she is prepared to “fight back” to ensure New York does not “go backward.” Yet, her record of relentless legal pursuits targeting Trump has led to accusations of bias, with some questioning whether she’s using her position for political gain rather than justice. Critics claim her ongoing actions demonstrate a selective approach to protecting rights, focused on political opponents rather than broad legal fairness.

State GOP chair Ed Cox was quick to condemn Hochul and James’ statements, describing them as “political theater.” Cox suggested their policies during the pandemic, including stringent restrictions and surveillance, contradict their current claims of defending New Yorkers’ rights. He accused them of using their platforms to posture against Trump while disregarding the freedoms of everyday New Yorkers.

The contrast between Hochul and James’ promises and their past actions has raised questions among constituents. Many are skeptical about whether these leaders are genuinely committed to defending rights or simply positioning themselves as Trump’s opposition. As they prepare for a clash with the incoming administration, they face growing scrutiny over whether they will uphold their promises or continue down a path of restrictive policies.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR